Protecting Family Values

I believe my values are shared with most Mississippians. As a Southern Baptist, I am a strong supporter of Christian family values.  I do not support gay marriage and believe in the traditional definition of marriage. 

Wicker Defends Judge Kavanaugh’s Qualifications Against Democratic Obstruction

Disruptions at Senate Hearing Distract From Judge’s Exceptional Credentials

September 10, 2018

Over the past week, the Senate Judiciary Committee held its confirmation hearing for Judge Brett Kavanaugh, President Trump’s nominee for the Supreme Court.  The hearing allowed the American public to hear from Judge Kavanaugh directly.  Like past Supreme Court nominees, he spent hours answering questions from lawmakers, and the Judiciary Committee will soon decide whether or not to report his nomination to the full Senate for a final vote.  

It was offensive and deeply disappointing that this opportunity for Americans to get to know Judge Kavanaugh was repeatedly interrupted, both by Democratic lawmakers calling for the committee to adjourn and protesters shouting as Capitol Police escorted them from the room.  According to news reports, there were 44 interruptions from Democrats in just the first hour.  

Nominee’s Records Reveal Mainstream Jurist

Despite many Democrats announcing their opposition immediately after Judge Kavanaugh’s nomination, some continue to insist that they lack ample access to documents from his career.  Judge Kavanaugh’s judicial record is well-documented in the more than 300 opinions he wrote during his 12 years as a judge on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals.  Approximately half a million pages of documents have been reviewed by the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Moreover, the substance of Judge Kavanaugh’s written opinions is just as sound as their scope, revealing a jurist decidedly in the judicial mainstream.  Judge Kavanaugh has been in the majority in all but a fraction of the cases he has decided, and the Supreme Court has adopted his position more than a dozen times – a testament to his respected legal judgment.

Democrats would do well to heed the advice of Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) in 2009, who warned against “fishing expeditions” for then-Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor.  The chief difference between 2009 and 2018 is the president making the nomination.  Americans have entrusted President Trump with this responsibility, and he has followed through with two outstanding nominees, Justice Neil Gorsuch and Judge Kavanaugh.

In the face of the hearing’s many disruptions, Judge Kavanaugh deftly demonstrated his legal knowledge and his faithfulness to the independence of the judiciary, as our Constitution sets forth in its separation of government powers.  His preparation is not surprising, given his service on the same federal bench as three of the Supreme Court’s current justices.  

Nominee Earns Highest Rating From American Bar Association

President Trump is not the only person who has given Judge Kavanaugh a strong endorsement.  The judge has earned praise from his professors, peers, and law clerks, as well as the highest rating from the American Bar Association.  This rating is given only to those who “meet the very highest standards of integrity, professional competence and judicial temperament.”  Even Democrats opposing his nomination consider it to be “the gold standard” for judicial nominees. 

It is disheartening to see delay tactics mar what is traditionally a bipartisan and respectful process.  For example, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg received a vote of 96 to 3 in the Senate when she was nominated by President Clinton in 1993.  Justice Anthony Kennedy, whom Judge Kavanaugh would replace, was confirmed by a vote of 97 to 0 after he was selected by President Reagan.  Judge Kavanaugh’s hearing suggests a much more divided confirmation process, but the constitutional duty of the Senate to provide “advice and consent” has not changed.  Political theater and grandstanding should not distract from this solemn responsibility. 

Wicker Asks Health Secretary to Stop Obamacare’s Abortion Coverage Expansion

Additional Steps Needed to Separate Abortion Coverage From Taxpayer-Supported Health-Care Plans

September 6, 2018

WASHINGTON - U.S. Senator Roger Wicker wrote to U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar to request the Administration take additional steps to mitigate Obamacare’s unprecedented expansion of abortion coverage. Wicker’s letter was signed by 18 other U.S. Senators. Wicker and his colleagues criticized Obama-era regulations that failed to enforce Section 1303 of Obamacare, which requires insurers offering abortion coverage to collect a separate payment for that coverage.

The Senators wrote in part, “The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) should issue new regulations aligning with legislative intent that insurance companies comply with and collect the abortion surcharge separately. Faithfully applying the law as written through new regulations will improve consumer awareness of the abortion surcharge.”

They went on to say, “As long as Section 1303 is implemented through current Obama-era regulations, its enforcement will remain sorely deficient.”

Wicker’s letter was signed by U.S. Senators Cindy Hyde-Smith, R-Miss., Roy Blunt, R-Mo., John Cornyn, R-Texas, Mike Crapo, R-Idaho, Ted Cruz, R-Texas, Steve Daines, R-Mont., Mike Enzi, R-Wyo., Joni Ernst, R-Iowa, Deb Fischer, R-Neb., John Hoeven, R-N.D., James Inhofe, R-Okla., Jerry Moran, R-Kan., James Risch, R-Idaho, Pat Roberts, R-Kan., Mike Rounds, R-S.D., Marco Rubio, R-Fla., John Thune, R-S.D., and Todd Young, R-Ind.

Click here for a PDF copy of the full letter, the text of which is available below:

 

Dear Secretary Azar,

 

The 2010 enactment of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (P.L. 111-148), also known as Obamacare, broke with the longstanding safeguards of the Hyde Amendment. For more than 40 years, the Hyde Amendment prohibited federal funding for elective abortions and health insurance plans that include coverage for elective abortions. Since that time, legislative proposals like No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion and Insurance Full Disclosure Act (S. 184) have been introduced in the Senate to remedy this severe problem with Obamacare. Until S. 184 is enacted into law, the Administration must take steps to mitigate Obamacare’s unprecedented expansion of abortion coverage.

 

In an effort to subvert the Hyde Amendment, Democrats established separate abortion accounting requirements in Section 1303 of Obamacare (42 U.S.C. § 18023). If an insurance issuer elects to offer abortion coverage, Section 1303 requires separate payment of at least $1 per enrollee per month as an abortion surcharge. While a plain reading of the statute makes clear that this surcharge must be separate from other payments, the Obama Administration failed to enforce Section 1303 and undermined the segregation of funds requirement through permissive regulations.

 

While we welcomed Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ October 2017 guidance regarding enforcement of Section 1303, meaningful enforcement requires new regulations. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) should issue new regulations aligning with legislative intent that insurance companies comply with and collect the abortion surcharge separately. Faithfully applying the law as written through new regulations will improve consumer awareness of the abortion surcharge.

 

The federal government should not provide taxpayer funding for abortion-covering plans. However, until this procedure that is morally opposed by a significant number of Americans is eliminated from Obamacare, HHS must enforce the law as written. As long as Section 1303 is implemented through current Obama-era regulations, its enforcement will remain sorely deficient. 

 

Thank you for your consideration of this matter.

 

Wicker Says Senate Is Getting the Job Done on Funding Bills

Lawmakers Have Overcome Past Roadblocks in Exercising ‘Power of the Purse’

August 27, 2018

The Senate has largely done its part to meet a major deadline, which is only a month away. September marks the end of the fiscal year, when federal funding decisions are due for 2019.

Thanks to bipartisan support for open debate and amendments, many of the funding decisions for next year have already been approved by the full Senate and are well on their way to becoming law.  When the House of Representatives gavels back into session after Labor Day, the Senate will have passed at least 9 of the 12 annual appropriations bills, demonstrating significant and encouraging progress toward restoring regular order to the Senate floor.    

Even some of the most persistent roadblocks have been overcome, such as the spending bill to fund the departments of Health and Human Services, Education, and Labor.  Funding for these departments had not received Senate floor consideration since 2007 but has now been passed by a vote of 85 to 7.

Funding Oversight Is Essential to Constitution’s Checks and Balances

A regular appropriations process is good for the American taxpayer, because the consideration of funding bills individually allows Congress to apply appropriate oversight on government agencies and cut wasteful spending.  Otherwise, the bills are put together in a massive, unwieldy “omnibus” measure to fund the government, which President Trump has said he would not sign again.

It is also critical for Congress to fulfill its unique “power of the purse,” a responsibility granted by the Constitution in its separation of powers.  As representatives of the people, lawmakers are best positioned to identify local needs and direct the appropriate funding toward them.  Likewise, control of the purse can put a check on any excessive spending by executive agencies.  

Bipartisan Cooperation Needed During Consideration of Supreme Court Nominee

Another constitutional duty the Senate is set to fulfill next month is its consideration of Judge Brett Kavanaugh for the Supreme Court seat left vacant by Justice Anthony Kennedy.  I recently spoke on the Senate floor about my support for Judge Kavanaugh, reminding my colleagues of the “advice and consent” that the Constitution asks the Senate to provide for judicial nominees.  

The noise from outside political groups who oppose Judge Kavanaugh should not distract from lawmakers’ full and thorough review of his credentials, which I have found to be impressive.  With 300 published legal opinions, there is no shortage of information on Judge Kavanaugh’s legal philosophy.  However, Democrats continue to make extraordinarily excessive demands in an effort to slow down the confirmation process. They have requested hundreds of thousands of documents from his career – more than any other previous Supreme Court nominee.

I look forward to the committee hearings and floor debate on Judge Kavanaugh, which are expected in the Senate in the coming weeks.  I am also hopeful my Democratic colleagues will extend the same bipartisan spirit of cooperation to Judge Kavanaugh’s confirmation process that has been essential to advancing this year’s appropriations bills.  His many qualifications and well-regarded reputation should speak for themselves.

Wicker Rejects Latest Attacks on Judge Kavanaugh

Miss. Senator Supports President Trump’s Supreme Court Nominee

August 22, 2018

WASHINGTON - U.S. Senator Roger Wicker, R-Miss., today spoke in support of President Trump’s nominee for the U.S. Supreme Court Judge Brett Kavanaugh. Wicker rejected claims by Senate Democrats that the nominee and Republicans have been withholding information. Wicker cited recent reports that more documents have been produced for Judge Kavanaugh than any previous Supreme Court nominee.

“Yesterday the Minority Leader of the United States Senate came to the floor and suggested Republicans and Judge Kavanaugh are hiding something,” Wicker said during his speech. “This raises the question, Madam President, how much can you hide about a distinguished judge who has been issuing opinions for 12 straight years on the Circuit Court of Appeals? How much can you hide about that person’s legal philosophy?”

Wicker went on to encourage his colleagues to follow what he termed the “Schumer Rule,” in light of Senator Chuck Schumer’s, D-N.Y., previous statements that a review of a judge’s judicial record is the best way to evaluate a Supreme Court nominee.

Wicker explained, “The Senate should not be distracted by these stall and delay tactics. Instead, let’s focus on the facts. Judge Kavanaugh brings with him a respected reputation and legal record. He has written some 300 published legal opinions. Let’s use the ‘Schumer Rule’ and judge him on those legal opinions.”

Click here to view Senator Wicker’s full remarks.

Wicker Traces Success Story of ‘JROTC Act’

Legislation Earns Widespread Support in Congress

August 20, 2018

Sometimes a conversation at church can spark an idea for a law.  That happened in early May, when my longtime friend Leland Speed told me about the success of the Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps, commonly known as JROTC, in the Jackson Public School system. 

As Leland explained, more than 90 percent of this year’s graduating seniors who participated in a JROTC program within the Jackson Public School system have been accepted into an institution of higher learning.  More than $7.5 million in scholarships have been awarded to these JROTC graduates.

JROTC’s Record of Positive Outcomes

I would come to find out that the success of the seven Jackson Public Schools with JROTC units is not an outlier.  According to a RAND Corporation study, participating in JROTC is likely to improve a student’s grade point average and test scores.  Cadets are more likely not to drop out of school but to graduate and go to college.  In the process, JROTC instills valuable leadership skills and community service, teaching high school students about personal responsibility and civic engagement. 

These findings match my own experience as an ROTC Cadet in college, and the record of success of many JROTC graduates.  In fact, two current members of the President’s cabinet, Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross and Housing and Urban Development Secretary Ben Carson, both participated in JROTC. 

But too often these programs are out of reach where they are most needed.  Hundreds of high schools across the country are on a waitlist to host a JROTC unit.

Beginning of ‘JROTC Act’

The more I learned about the success of JROTC programs, I better understood that more students would benefit from these programs in their schools.  Earlier this year, I introduced the “JROTC Opportunities for Transformational Change Act,” or “JROTC Act,” in the U.S. Senate.  The bill set out to authorize funding for 100 additional JROTC units and to make reforms that would help schools in rural and underserved areas participate. 

As a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, I also offered my “JROTC Act” as an amendment to the annual defense authorization bill.  It was adopted into the full bill by the committee and soon passed by the entire Senate.  Last month, the “JROTC Act” was included in the defense bill’s final conference report passed by both the House and the Senate.  President Trump signed the bill into law this week. 

Senate Committee Grants Additional Funding

Every year, there are two pieces to the puzzle when it comes to defense spending.  An annual defense authorization bill approves funding levels for our military, and then the defense appropriations bill actually puts the money toward the priorities that the authorization bill has identified. 

I am pleased to report that the defense funding bill approved by the Senate Appropriations Committee supports my “JROTC Act” by increasing our investment in JROTC.  This bill should come to the Senate floor for a vote soon. 

Our state can support more JROTC units, and I hope this legislation enables that for the communities in Mississippi that could benefit the most from these programs.  Not every bill idea emerges from a conversation at church, but the “JROTC Act” is an encouraging example of how policy solutions can be driven by local success stories.  

Wicker Supports Prohibition of Federal Grants to Abortion Providers

Miss. Senator Encourages HHS Secretary to Finalize the ‘Protect Life Rule’

July 27, 2018

WASHINGTON - U.S. Senator Roger Wicker, R-Miss., and more than two dozen of his Senate colleagues wrote to U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Alex Azar to request the department promptly finalize the proposed “Protect Life Rule.”  The rule, announced by President Donald J. Trump in May, would prohibit Title X Family Planning grantees from co-locating with abortion clinics or referring clients for abortions.

The Senators wrote in part, “This much-needed reform will finally end the practice of ‘colocation,’ where abortions are conducted in the same facility as the Title X-funded family planning activities. This practice made federal funds vulnerable to misuse in support of abortion activities. It also implied that abortion was a method of family planning, in violation of Congressional intent.”

The letter was led by U.S. Senators James Lankford, R-Okla., and Roy Blunt, R-Mo. In addition to Wicker, the letter was also signed by U.S. Senator Cindy Hyde-Smith, R-Miss.

Click here for a PDF copy of the full letter.

Helsinki Commission Chair Welcomes Release of Pastor Brunson from Prison

Senator Wicker Calls for Full Acquittal

July 25, 2018

WASHINGTON—Following Pastor Andrew Brunson’s release from prison to house arrest by Turkish authorities today, Helsinki Commission Chairman Sen. Roger Wicker (MS) issued the following statement:

“I welcome the long overdue decision by a Turkish court today to transfer Pastor Brunson to house arrest. This first step is a humane gesture for a falsely accused man who has endured more than 650 days in a maximum security prison. I will continue to seek full justice for Pastor Brunson, which includes his acquittal and freedom to leave Turkey.”

Pastor Brunson is one of several American citizens, including NASA scientist Serkan Gölge, who have been caught up in the sweeping purge that followed the 2016 coup attempt in Turkey. Pastor Brunson spent more than year and a half in jail on national security charges. Gölge and two Turkish employees of U.S. consulates stand charged with similar terrorism offenses despite no involvement with violent activity—a situation faced by thousands of other Turks. A third consulate employee remains under house arrest on dubious charges.  

Last week, the four senior members of the Helsinki Commission expressed concern about Pastor Brunson’s ongoing imprisonment. In November 2017, the Helsinki Commission held a hearing on the detention of American citizens and U.S. consulate employees in Turkey. A month earlier, Helsinki Commission leaders called on President Erdogan to lift the state of emergency imposed in July 2016 after the failed military coup against his government. Turkey ended its two-year-long state of emergency last week, but the Grand National Assembly earlier today approved legislation that effectively enshrines many of President Erdogan’s controversial emergency decrees.

Ahead of the May 2017 meeting between President Donald Trump and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Helsinki Commission leaders also urged President Trump to seek guarantees that U.S. citizens jailed in Turkey will have their cases promptly and fairly adjudicated and receive full consular assistance.

 

Helsinki Commission Leaders Troubled by Continued Imprisonment of U.S. Pastor Andrew Brunson in Turkey

July 18, 2018

WASHINGTON—Following today’s ruling by a Turkish court that U.S. pastor Andrew Brunson will remain jailed pending his next trial date in October, the four senior members of the U.S. Helsinki Commission—Helsinki Chairman Roger Wicker (MS), Co-Chairman Rep. Chris Smith (NJ-04), Ranking Commissioner Sen. Ben Cardin (MD), and Ranking Commissioner Rep. Alcee Hastings (FL-20)—released the following statements:

“The cruelty of today’s decision is astonishing,” said Chairman Wicker. “By extending Pastor Brunson’s indefinite detention and setting his next trial date for mid-October, the Turkish government has declared its intention to keep this innocent man in jail past the two-year anniversary of his arrest without conviction or any credible evidence against him. There is no room in NATO for hostage-taking. Pastor Brunson should be freed immediately.”

“Over the past 18 months, it has become clear that President Erdogan has the ability to end this injustice, but he refuses to do so,” said Co-Chairman Smith. “President Erdogan has put Pastor Brunson and his family through 649 days of enormous suffering. Pastor Brunson must be released immediately, otherwise this cruel abuse of a U.S. citizen should have serious consequences for our country’s relationship with the Turkish government.” 

“I remain deeply concerned that Mr. Brunson remains in prison in Turkey,” said Sen. Cardin. “Today’s action represents yet another miscarriage of justice in this case. The Turkish government must drop its spurious charges and release Mr. Brunson immediately.”

“Turkey’s persecution of Pastor Brunson has been characterized by conspiratorial charges, anonymous witnesses, and political agendas, and bears no resemblance to a credible judicial process,” said Rep. Hastings. “Even as the Turkish government prepares to lift its nearly two-year state of emergency, we should not be fooled into thinking that the rule of law is returning to Turkey. Pastor Brunson’s wrongful imprisonment proves that nothing is likely to change.”

Pastor Brunson is one of several American citizens, including NASA scientist Serkan Gölge, who have been caught up in the sweeping purge that followed the 2016 coup attempt in Turkey. Despite the efforts of the President of the United States, among many others, he has spent more than a year in jail on national security charges. Gölge and two Turkish employees of U.S. consulates stand charged with similar terrorism offenses despite no involvement with violent activity—a situation faced by thousands of other Turks. A third consulate employee remains under house arrest on dubious charges.  

In November 2017, the Helsinki Commission held a hearing on the detention of American citizens and U.S. consulate employees in Turkey. A month earlier, Helsinki Commission leaders called on President Erdogan to lift the state of emergency imposed in July 2016 after the failed military coup against his government. The Turkish government has announced it will not seek to extend emergency rule when it expires tomorrow, but draft legislation introduced by Erdogan’s government would enshrine many of his controversial emergency decrees.

Ahead of the May 2017 meeting between President Donald Trump and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Helsinki Commission leaders also urged President Trump to seek guarantees that U.S. citizens jailed in Turkey will have their cases promptly and fairly adjudicated and receive full consular assistance. 

Wicker Underscores the Importance of Conservative Voices on the Supreme Court

July 13, 2018

Now that President Trump has appointed Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court, the Senate can begin its work on his confirmation.  This process will include a hearing and vote by the Senate Judiciary Committee and then consideration by all Senators on the Senate floor.

Like Justice Neil Gorsuch, whom President Trump appointed last year, Judge Kavanaugh is an outstanding nominee to the High Court.  His credentials include more than a decade on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, and his impressive record falls well within the judicial mainstream.  I am confident he will be a strong conservative addition to the Supreme Court, diligently protecting the Constitution and the inalienable rights it affords to every American.

The confirmation of a new justice to the Supreme Court is always a pivotal moment for our country, and Judge Kavanaugh’s consideration by the Senate is an opportunity for Americans to learn for themselves about his legal career and court opinions. 

Wins for Non-Union Workers, Pro-Life Pregnancy Centers

The decisions made by the Supreme Court for this year’s term demonstrate the difference one justice can make.  For example, with a ruling of 5-4, the Supreme Court upheld the First Amendment rights of government workers who do not want to pay dues to labor unions. 

The decision of one justice also made the difference in a particularly significant victory for free speech and the sanctity of life.  In National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra, the justices invalidated part of a California law that forced crisis pregnancy centers to inform a woman about state-funded abortion services, even if those services went against the centers’ deeply held religious beliefs.  The ruling could have implications for similar laws in other states.

Direction of the Court Hangs in the Balance

These court cases follow a number of other major cases in recent years decided by a similarly slim margin and demonstrating just how fragile the balance of the Court is. One of those cases was the Supreme Court’s decision that the individual mandate of Obamacare amounted to a tax. Another case culminated in a 5-4 ruling to protect an individual’s right to own a handgun, overturning the District of Columbia’s handgun ban because it violated the Second Amendment.

With so many important issues at stake, the confirmation of a Supreme Court justice, who will assume a lifetime position, cannot be taken lightly.  This is a decision that far surpasses a presidential or congressional term.  I commend President Trump for his determination to put the best legal minds on the Supreme Court bench.  He has sought jurists with a solid reputation for both their judicial capabilities and their impartiality when interpreting the law.  Judge Kavanaugh has this reputation, and I look forward to participating in his confirmation process in the U.S. Senate.

Wicker Welcomes Nomination of Brett Kavanaugh for Supreme Court

July 9, 2018

WASHINGTON - U.S. Senator Roger Wicker, R-Miss., today issued the following statement after President Donald J. Trump nominated Judge Brett Kavanaugh to serve as an Associate Justice on the Supreme Court of the United States.

“President Trump has once again kept his promise to nominate to the Supreme Court a well-qualified jurist with a record of upholding the integrity of the law and the Constitution. This appointment will help shape the nation’s highest court for a generation. I look forward to meeting with Judge Kavanaugh, and to the Senate giving full and timely consideration of this nominee.”

Judge Brett Kavanaugh serves on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. Kavanaugh received his undergraduate and law degrees from Yale. He clerked for retiring Supreme Court Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy. Beginning in 2001, Kavanaugh served in the George W. Bush administration as an Associate Counsel to the President and later as the White House Staff Secretary. He was nominated to serve on the District of Columbia Circuit by President Bush, and was confirmed in 2006.